Will the real State Attorney please stand up?

first_img March 17, 2017 at 9:23 am Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. TAGSGreg Jackson Previous articleMayor Kilsheimer: “We created more than 1,000 jobs in the projects we approved”Next articleSt. Patrick’s Day: Fact and Fiction Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR At certain points in my life I have been conflicted over the death penalty. The place where I’m at now still flinched somewhat due to the use of DP as a deterrent but statistics show its used more against minorities than whites for the same crime. Yet as a Christian who believes in the word of God, my studies of his word leads me to believe that he expects us to follow the laws of the land in which we live. As the state attorney, Ayala is expected to uphold the laws of the land and the office she represents fully, and if she has a personal conflict that puts her at odds and unable to fulfill the cloffice capacity in which she sits, then she needs to respectfully vacate that office. LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Please enter your comment! Mama Mia Dan Marcus Sconierd Rev Ruth Diehl Reply OpinionBy Greg Jackson, Esq.Greg JacksonListen, I approached this with an open mind, and I promise that I really, really tried to understand what in the world Orange County State Attorney, Aramis Ayala, is going through. In case you missed the breaking news story at eleven this morning, Ms. Ayala announced that not only will she refuse to seek the death penalty against alleged (actual) murderer, Markeith Loyd, but she will also refuse to seek the death penalty in any murder case in Orange County, no matter the circumstances or severity. Even in a case where a man guns down a woman and her unborn child in cold blood, attempts to murder a young man in the prime of his life, then executes a decorated, respected police officer on the street, Ms. Ayala announced that the death penalty is off the table — period.To place an absolute moratorium on seeking the death penalty in any case that warrants such consideration is unfathomable. Yes, I heard her say that the cost to house death row inmates is astronomical, but what does that have to do with her office? When was the last time you heard a quarterback say “I am not throwing any passes over 30 yards because more people will come to the game and hot dog prices at the stadium will increase.” That sounds ridiculous, right? Well so does Ms. Ayala’s argument about the cost to house inmates. That has nothing to do with her department’s budget.Then I heard her say that the death penalty is not a deterrent. Well, I beg to differ. There are a lot of bosses, pizza delivery drivers and clowns (real and figurative) that are still walking around because folks know if they killed them in a fit of rage they would go to jail and possibly be put to death. While I have made a serious situation slightly humorous, I truly believe that for some of the population they do not kill people because they do not want to face the death penalty. Based on Ms. Ayala’s logic, one could argue that we should stop arresting people and trying them for crimes because that does not deter people from committing crimes. However, thankfully, that has not stopped law enforcement from doing its jobs apprehending criminals, or even Ms. Ayala from doing parts of her job, which is to try criminals who are arrested.I also heard Ms. Ayala say that families would not get the closure they wanted if the person who murdered their loved one were put to death, but the last time I checked death pretty much closes out the book of life. What does not allow for closure is a murderer who receives three meals a day, while the person they killed lies in a grave. What does not allow for closure is a murderer getting visits from their loved ones in prison, while the families and friends of the person murdered cry over a gravesite. What does not allow for closure is a murderer getting book and movie deals, while the person they killed is memorialized on a t-shirt.Ms. Ayala’s stance as the top prosecutor in our county to never seek the death penalty is irresponsible and selfish. I found it interesting that she used the words “I”, “me” and “my” more than she did “we” “us” or “together” during her manifesto, I mean statement. Moreover, if she would have run on the platform that she would never seek the death penalty, it is doubtful that she could have defeated even a flawed, Jeff Ashton, who had no problem seeking the death penalty. As Ms. Ayala stood boldly and confidently this morning declaring her research as the gold-standard of what this community needs, I am pleased to see that one person was not asleep at the switch – Governor Rick Scott. Quite possibly, Governor Scott looked at Orange County and saw a State Attorney refusing to even consider all statutory options available to dispense justice and he felt enough is enough. In a move that Ms. Ayala probably did not anticipate, Governor Scott has appointed Lake County State Attorney Brad King as the special prosecutor to do Ms. Ayala’s job –handle the murder cases of Markeith Loyd and seek the death penalty for his unconscionable, violently murderous acts. Unlike the many supporters of Ms. Ayala, Governor Scott rightly determined that it was not her job to do away with the death penalty in the State of Florida, much less Orange County, Florida.I am certain that this is not the last that we will hear of this matter or of Ms. Ayala, but I am sure there is now some clarity on the expectations of our elected officials to do their jobs to the best of their abilities, despite politics or their personal opinions – in my humble opinion.Greg Jackson is a former Assistant Attorney General for the State of Florida, military veteran, current Orange County District 2 Representative on the Board of Zoning Adjustments, and General Counsel for the Community Redevelopment Agency. He has been as an active member of the Central Florida community for nearly 20 years. He was most recently a candidate for the Florida House District 45 seat. March 19, 2017 at 5:36 pm Free webinar for job seekers on best interview answers, hosted by Goodwill June 11 Support conservation and fish with NEW Florida specialty license plate center_img March 18, 2017 at 8:53 pm March 18, 2017 at 9:22 pm You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Reply Reply She needs NOT to be paid with tax payer dollars….FIRE her….imho Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Reply 4 COMMENTS I so totally disagree with your opinion of her job and the execution of such. First and foremost we do not have the right to take another’s life even those guilty of such horrific crimes. I do not know the details of the young women’s death and as tragic as it is we are obligated to act justly and have mercy. Does he deserve mercy most think not; but the God I serve had mercy on all. Death penalty is archaic and detrimental to our society. Justice is that he lives to suffer as the families of those loved ones lives he has taken. She’s doing her job the unqualified uninformed need to take a seat. Please enter your name here Well, I don’t know the law, but there are some others who do, and one of the ones that thoroughly knows the law very well is Belvin Perry, who was a judge here in Orange County, and now is working in a private practice law firm, and speaks on tv when subjects related to law come up, such as this case of our prosecutor announcing she will not seek the death penalty for anyone under her jurisdiction. Mr. Perry who knows the law like the back of his hand, believes that she will be removed by our governor, Rick Scott, for the reason of neglect of duty of her job, and that she will then go before a hearing of the Senate who will make a determination of her fate as a prosecutor here in our area, and if they decide to remove her, she will be removed from office, and it will be up to the governor to appoint someone, who he chooses to replace her, until the next election. The Anatomy of Fear last_img read more

Is your business strategy driving your rewards strategy?

first_imgCredit unions create rewards programs for a variety of reasons, from attracting and retaining customers to driving debit and credit card use to simply checking a box.  While most have very specific goals in mind with such a program, the overall program design tends to be both tactical and narrow in focus. These programs very often fail to achieve their full potential.Reasons for failure can vary.  Some customers report lack of effective marketing.  Others believe the programs can be too hard to use or that they do not deliver enough value to participants.  We believe the real root causes are much more fundamental than that and start much earlier than choosing a vendor or approach.  1. Many credit unions lack a rigorous customer and product engagement strategy; and2. Too often there is only a cursory understanding of Incentives and Behavior Change Theory.Further, the industry’s foray into merchant funded rewards programs was largely a failure.  Why? These institutions were unwilling or unable to invest in a program or system. With a real understanding of the strategy and profitability, institutions can justify spending money to make money.  Without that? Well … you get what you pay for.Community financial institutions that can articulate their customers and segmentation have a clear advantage, but all too often they lack a good analytical or market-based conception of who their retail customer and what behavior they want to drive.The reality is nearly ALL business is about incentives. Credit unions that understand this look at the world in a very different way from those that don’t.  Want to drive low cost deposits? Want to engage millennials? Want to drive improve retention of your most profitable accounts? Want to increase the number of products purchased in your target segments?The difference we see between tactical and strategic thinking in this process are stark:Tactical Thinking: We are sometimes told by institutions that their primary goal for a rewards program is to drive interchange fee lift and to do it at the lowest possible cost.  We know these programs too often will fail – not because programs cannot drive those economic goals, but because the basic goal articulation betrays the lack of rigor behind the project.  You cannot simply check a box and nothing (including driving interchange) is ever free.Strategic Thinking: Consider a different institution that has assessed its market and competitive placement; determined which customers, products, and activities are profitable; and thoughtfully developed approaches to each that utilize incentives to drive behavior.   These programs are better integrated, create better results, and often establish a platform for long term growth and capabilities for the instituting. We see these institutions drive substantially better results in the short and long run.Credit unions that start with business strategy and that build a discipline and understanding of incentives can see a step change in performance.  Too many today choose programs tactically, deploy them tactically, and never see the programs achieve their full potential. The key to achieving more strategic and game-changing results from these programs is to be more fundamentally strategic and to better understand how incentives drive behavior. 2SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblr,Dwayne Spradlin Dwayne currently serves as CEO of Buzz Points, which drives revenue and retention through localized rewards programs and data-driven marketing solutions for community banks and credit unions. Dwayne is a … Web: www.buzzpoints.com Detailslast_img read more

World Bank warns pandemic could push 60 million into extreme poverty

first_imgMalpass said the bank anticipates a five percent contraction in the world economy this year, with severe effects on the poorest countries.”Our estimate is that up to 60 million people will be pushed into extreme poverty, erasing all the progress made in poverty alleviation in the past three years, and our forecasts indicate a deep recession,” Malpass said.Nearly five million people have been infected by the virus around the world, and more than 300,000 have died since it first appeared in China in late 2019.So far, the World Bank has spent $5.5 billion to shore up beleaguered health systems, economies and social services in poor countries. The head of the World Bank warned Tuesday that the coronavirus crisis threatens to push some 60 million people into extreme poverty, wiping out the gains made over the past three years.The global lending institution is already financing aid programs in 100 countries, under its commitment to spend $160 billion over the next 15 months, bank president David Malpass said.”That’s home to 70 percent of the world’s population. This represents a significant milestone,” Malpass told a conference call. Topics :center_img But Malpass stressed that the World Bank’s efforts alone were insufficient, and urged donor nations to step up bilateral aid to poorer countries to ensure a durable recovery.He said restoring the flow of remittance payments and tourism — key sources of income for developing countries — would be “critical steps in the reopening.”A year-long moratorium on debt payments by less developed countries — called for by the G-20 in mid-April — has gained growing acceptance, he noted.According to Malpass, 14 countries have agreed to such a suspension of debt payments, another 23 are expected to request it, and 17 were giving it serious consideration.”That’s a very welcome and very fast response and positive response to the G-20 countries’ commitment,” he said.last_img read more